UAPoli logo

Outreach
Politicians
Statements
Legislation
Hearings

Learn
How to Use
About

  • Plans
UAPoli logo
Log inSign up
UAPoli logo

Propelling bipartisan UAP disclosure efforts in DC.

  • Outreach
  • Explore
  • How to Use
  • Learn
  • Politicians
  • Statements
  • Legislation
  • Hearings
  • Newsroom
  • Account
  • About Us
  • Plans
    1. Statements
    2. In this statement, Representative Mike Gallagher underscores...

    “
    I think they should be taken seriously. Obviously, Grusch’s background is legit: military, Intel., high level security clearance, so you can't just dismiss him. The question is whether he had firsthand, sort of, access to some of this stuff. Because you can't dismiss him, you're left with two possibilities: One, he’s telling the truth. Two, he’s misinformed.
    Photo of Mike Gallagher
    Rep. Mike Gallagher

    Republican from Wisconsin

    July 13, 2023

    In this statement, Representative Mike Gallagher underscores the significance of treating the UAP (UFO) issue seriously, based on the credibility of Grusch's military and intelligence background. Gallagher acknowledges two possibilities regarding David Grusch's claims: either he's telling the truth or he's misinformed.

    0

    Bipartisan index

    Other Statements
    Check out statements similar this one by Mike Gallagher.

    June 27, 2023

    “

    We've created the mother of all whistleblower processes. Where if you want to come forward, but you're afraid of being punished, or you're afraid of breaking what's called a non-disclosure agreement, we have a process where you can talk to Congress, or you can talk to AARO, and say "Hey, I saw this, I saw that, I was apart of this program."

    July 13, 2023

    “

    I think they should be taken seriously. Obviously, Grusch’s background is legit: military, Intel., high level security clearance, so you can't just dismiss him. The question is whether he had firsthand, sort of, access to some of this stuff. Because you can't dismiss him, you're left with two possibilities: One, he’s telling the truth. Two, he’s misinformed.